Pular para o conteúdo principal

The Economic History of the Last 2,000 Years in 1 Little Graph

By Derek Thompson
Jun 19 2012, 8:59 AM ET 180


That headline is a big promise. But here it is: The economic history of the world going back to Year 1 showing the major powers' share of world GDP, from a research letter written by Michael Cembalest, chairman of market and investment strategy at JP Morgan. 
Screen Shot 2012-06-20 at 9.37.55 AM.png
I'm guessing that your first question, if you started scanning from the left, is: Wait, India was by far the biggest economy at the dawn of AD? Yup, India.
In Year 1, India and China were home to one-third and one-quarter of the world's population, respectively. It's hardly surprising, then, that they also commanded one-third and one-quarter of the world's economy, respectively.
Before the Industrial Revolution, there wasn't really any such thing as lasting income growth from productivity. In the thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution, civilization was stuck in the Malthusian Trap. If lots of people died, incomes tended to go up, as fewer workers benefited from a stable supply of crops. If lots of people were born, however, incomes would fall, which often led to more deaths. That explains the "trap," and it also explains why populations so closely approximated GDP around the world.
The industrial revolution(s) changed all that. Today, the U.S. accounts for 5% of the world population and 21% of its GDP. Asia (minus Japan) accounts for 60% of the world's population and 30% of its GDP.
So, one way to read the graph, very broadly speaking, is that everything to the left of 1800 is an approximation of population distribution around the world and everything to the right of 1800 is a demonstration of productivity divergences around the world -- the mastering of means of manufacturing, production and supply chains by steam, electricity, and ultimately software that concentrated, first in the West, and then spread to Japan, Russia, China, India, Brazil, and beyond.
(via Paul Kedrosky)

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

Generaciones Baby Boomers, GEN X y Millennials

Imóveis lançados em 2014 podem ser ainda mais compactos

Examen.com Comitê acadêmico especializado em mercado imobiliário divulga suas perspectivas para os preços e características dos lançamentos de imóveis no ano que vem.                   Prédio em construção: preços no Rio e São Paulo continuarão pressionados em relação às demais cidades São Paulo – Em 2014, a alta nos preços dos lançamentos residenciais deve se manter no mesmo ritmo deste ano, e os apartamentos lançados podem ficar ainda mais compactos nos grandes centros urbanos. Esta é a visão do Comitê de Mercado, formado por professores e pesquisadores do Núcleo de Real Estate da Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo (NRE-Poli-USP), e de empresários e executivos do mercado imobiliário ouvidos pelo próprio comitê. As conclusões do Comitê e as ideias dos profissionais que atuam no mercado de lançamentos imobiliários residenciais foram reunidas em um documento que traz as per...

“Management Time: Who’s got the Monkey”

If you can relate to the following situation, you should definitely read the article: Let us imagine that a manager is walking down the hall and that he notices one of his subordinates, Jones, coming his way. When the two meet, Jones greets the manager with, “Good morning. By the way, we’ve got a problem. You see …. “As Jones continues, the manager recognizes in this problem the two characteristics common to all the problems his subordinates gratuitously bring to his attention. Namely, the manager knows (a) enough to get involved, but (b)not enough to make the on-the-spot decision expected of him. Eventually, the manager says, “So glad you brought this up. I’m in a rush right now. Meanwhile, let me think about it, and I’ll let you know.” Then he and Jones part company. You’ve just allowed the actual problem or “monkey” to leap from your employee back to yours. Imagine taking too many monkeys and you won’t be able to handle your actual job ! The problem your employee might...